![](https://www.yaacovapelbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/yaacov-apelbaum-f18-instrument-panel-facebook-twitter-and-youtube.jpg)
On Privatizing Intelligence Gathering
It turns out that the organization that prided itself on beating the CIA in his ability to get stuff done for a fraction of the cost got hacked through the most benign means possible.
![](https://www.yaacovapelbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/yaacov-apelbaum-choosing-between-options.jpg)
Choosing Between Schedule, Budget, Scope, and Quality
Argumentum ad populum is that the best way to beat your competitor is to one-up him. If he has 2 features, you need 3 (4 would be even better). If he is budgeting 1 x $ on his solution, you need to spend 2 x $.
![](https://www.yaacovapelbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/esb-vs-etl-yaacov-apelbaum.jpg)
To ESB or not to ESB is the question. Or is it more noble to just ETL it?
To borrow a metaphor from Winston Churchill,
![](https://www.yaacovapelbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/yaacovapelbaumdrivingthemessage.jpg)
Driving the Message
From an evolutionary point of view, it seems that the quadrant 1 and 3 messaging mediums (see chart) represent a form of r/K selection classification. Each trades between quantity and quality. The focus in quadrant 1 is to increase the quality of the content with higher expense per message. The focus in quadrant 3 is to increase the quantity of the content with a corresponding reduction in quality and lower expense per message.